<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nathan Howell &#187; lifestreaming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nathanhowell.net/tag/lifestreaming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nathanhowell.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 05:24:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Lifestreaming is only part of what I want</title>
		<link>http://nathanhowell.net/2008/01/23/lifestreaming-is-only-part-of-what-i-want/</link>
		<comments>http://nathanhowell.net/2008/01/23/lifestreaming-is-only-part-of-what-i-want/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 02:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifestreaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">nathanhowell.net/2008/01/23/lifestreaming-is-only-part-of-what-i-want</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more I read, the more I see that the reason all the lifestreaming stuff out there mostly escaped me until now is that I&#8217;ve arrived at it via a different route. See, I want a whole new way to use computers and work with ideas and thoughts (not that I think big or anything&#8230;), [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I read, the more I see that the reason all the lifestreaming stuff out there mostly <a href="http://nathanhowell.net/turns-out-its-called-lifestreaming">escaped me</a> until now is that I&#8217;ve arrived at it via a different route. See, I want a whole new way to use computers and work with ideas and thoughts (not that I think big or anything&#8230;), and lifestreaming is really just a small side effect of that ridiculously large goal.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had a vague sort of plan evolving in my head for this thing for years now. I started out focusing on the user interface, working out the capabilities that I wanted. But there&#8217;s not much point to a UI without anything in it, so I turned to thinking about the data I&#8217;d need to store (um, everything), and how to store it. <a href="http://couchdb.org">CouchDb</a> has had my attention for a while as the most likely storage system for this, at least at first. I&#8217;m currently reading <a href="http://www.onintelligence.org/">On Intelligence</a>, so <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Hawkins">Jeff Hawkins</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchical_Temporal_Memory">hierarchical temporal memory</a> <em>seems</em> like it could be even better, if it, you know, existed and I really understood its potential capabilities.</p>
<p>Anyway, my point is that I&#8217;ve been wanting a system to aggregate and store <em>all</em> my stuff, and that&#8217;s really what <a href="http://creeva.com/2008/01/11/life-caching-is-better-then-life-streams/">lifecaching</a> is about. It has other names too; one that I like is <a href="http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/08/22/hosted-lifebits-scenarios/">lifebits</a>. I&#8217;m starting my own project to mess with this (which will be open source once I have something useful), and I&#8217;ll write about it plenty, I&#8217;m sure. One goal will be to get this site running on top of it soonish.</p>
<p>I know this is all pretty hand-wavy stuff, and I&#8217;m smart enough to know that I&#8217;m probably not <em>that</em> smart. I&#8217;m only just beginning to dig into some of the difficult details of this system, and believe me, I know it&#8217;s all going to be way harder to do than I think it is (and I already think it&#8217;s hard). Gotta try it anyway. These grand plans of mine have just been idle speculation and a few big, messy mindmaps so far, and it&#8217;s time to start taking a few baby steps toward the goal. Any progress is better than none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nathanhowell.net/2008/01/23/lifestreaming-is-only-part-of-what-i-want/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why would I lifestream without caching?</title>
		<link>http://nathanhowell.net/2008/01/21/why-would-i-lifestream-without-caching/</link>
		<comments>http://nathanhowell.net/2008/01/21/why-would-i-lifestream-without-caching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 01:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifestreaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">nathanhowell.net/2008/01/21/why-would-i-lifestream-without-caching</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One lifestreaming article that I actually found surprising was about lifecaching. I agree completely with that article, so why was it surprising? Because I hadn&#8217;t considered caching to be optional. Sucking in all that data and saving it in a system that I control is a fundamental requirement. It&#8217;s the first step, not an add-on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One lifestreaming article that I actually found surprising was about <a href="http://creeva.com/2008/01/11/life-caching-is-better-then-life-streams/">life<em>caching</em></a>. I agree completely with that article, so why was it surprising? Because I hadn&#8217;t considered caching to be optional. Sucking in all that data and saving it in a system that <em>I control</em> is a fundamental requirement. It&#8217;s the <em>first step</em>, not an add-on feature.</p>
<p>(Hm. Does lifestream work as a verb?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nathanhowell.net/2008/01/21/why-would-i-lifestream-without-caching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turns out it&#8217;s called lifestreaming</title>
		<link>http://nathanhowell.net/2008/01/20/turns-out-its-called-lifestreaming/</link>
		<comments>http://nathanhowell.net/2008/01/20/turns-out-its-called-lifestreaming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifestreaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">nathanhowell.net/2008/01/20/turns-out-its-called-lifestreaming</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve spent a lot of time this week thinking about exactly what I want to do with this site. I gradually built a mental image that combined all my public &#8220;stuff&#8221;. It would suck in feeds of my activity from all over the net, whether I used twitter, or tumblr, or facebook, or del.icio.us, or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve spent a lot of time this week thinking about exactly what I want to do with this site. I gradually built a mental image that combined all my public &#8220;stuff&#8221;. It would suck in feeds of my activity from all over the net, whether I used <a href="http://twitter.com">twitter</a>, or <a href="http://tumblr.com">tumblr</a>, or <a href="http://facebook.com">facebook</a>, or <a href="http://del.icio.us">del.icio.us</a>, or whatever else happened to be useful. All that stuff would get combined and displayed in interesting, useful ways (to me at least, and hopefully to others too) right here.</p>
<p>Just as I was figuring all this out and getting really interested in the whole thing, <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/lifestreaming_primer.php">this article about lifestreaming</a> came along (with a link to the very interesting <a href="http://lifestreamblog.com/">Lifestream Blog</a>). So all my great ideas already have a nice name and everything. Figures. In hindsight, I can remember lots of news over the years about lifestreaming and life recording, but the term itself doesn&#8217;t ring a bell. The way I had it pictured in my head, though, it was a world of too-much-information. Not something I was interested in.</p>
<p>Now that I&#8217;ve come up with it <em>myself</em>, though, it sounds fantastic. At least, when I do it my way&#8230; So this site will be my playground for whatever crazy lifestreaming ideas I have or I find on the interwebs. Should be interesting. Lifestreaming actually meshes really nicely with a project I&#8217;ve been playing with in my head for years, so there&#8217;s lots more of this crap to look forward to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nathanhowell.net/2008/01/20/turns-out-its-called-lifestreaming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
